The Good Guys
Their Adversaries
Nuggets vs Pelicans II: "Rebound!"
If you are viewing the pre-game version of the TPM piece, and you enjoy gonzo-basketball reporting, I invite you to please join me after the game where the same link will lead you to the post-game version. In it, all the disjointed/unsightly blanks below will be filled, complete with data/analysis and more snark than "Snarknado VI: Snakenado", which I'm told is about a pessimistic, albino, black mamba who emerges from micro-bursts to torment the people of Los Angeles with shady tweets.
Also, my DIY music production and videos can be heard/seen here if you don't value your ear-balls & eye-drums.
Got it? Or as the immortal Syd Barrett might say, "Have you got it yet?"
I've also recently made a compilation of all of Pink Floyd's essential studio works, including solo projects of all five members, all in chronological order from '65-2017 which you can check out here.
And now what none of you come here for; how about some basketball nerdery?!?!
(After these messages... Er Nicknames)
Denver Nuggets Roster
Coach: Michael "Post" Malone
| Name | POS | Age | HT | WT | College | Salary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
SF
|
30
|
6' 6"
|
181 lbs
|
Memphis
|
$13,723,214
|
|
 |
C
|
21
|
7' 2"
|
220 lbs
|
Oregon
|
$2,058,240
|
|
 |
PG
|
30
|
5' 10"
|
195 lbs
|
--
|
$3,200,000
|
|
 |
SF
|
23
|
6' 8"
|
236 lbs
|
--
|
$1,517,981
|
|
 |
SG
|
24
|
6' 6"
|
205 lbs
|
South Carolina
|
$1,762,796
|
|
 |
PF
|
25
|
6' 8"
|
235 lbs
|
Arizona
|
$18,136,364
|
|
 |
PF
|
30
|
6' 8"
|
227 lbs
|
Alabama
|
$7,199,760
|
|
 |
G
|
27
|
6' 7"
|
190 lbs
|
Tulsa
|
$1,620,564
|
|
 |
PG
|
22
|
5' 10"
|
175 lbs
|
Marquette
|
--
|
|
 |
C
|
26
|
6' 11"
|
284 lbs
|
--
|
$29,542,010
|
|
 |
C
|
33
|
7' 0"
|
270 lbs
|
Nevada
|
$4,200,000
|
|
 |
PF
|
36
|
6' 7"
|
257 lbs
|
Louisiana Tech
|
$1,000,000
|
|
 |
PG
|
25
|
6' 2"
|
183 lbs
|
Iowa State
|
$1,588,231
|
|
 |
PG
|
24
|
6' 3"
|
215 lbs
|
Kentucky
|
$27,285,000
|
|
 |
PF
|
20
|
6' 9"
|
240 lbs
|
Arizona
|
$2,284,800
|
|
 |
SF
|
22
|
6' 10"
|
218 lbs
|
Missouri
|
$3,550,800
|
New Orleans Pelicans Roster
| Name | POS | Age | HT | WT | College | Salary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
C
|
27
|
6' 11"
|
265 lbs
|
Pittsburgh
|
$29,592,696
|
|
 |
SG
|
22
|
6' 6"
|
205 lbs
|
Virginia Tech
|
$3,113,160
|
|
 |
PG
|
23
|
6' 6"
|
190 lbs
|
UCLA
|
$11,003,782
|
|
 |
SG
|
31
|
6' 1"
|
214 lbs
|
Kentucky
|
$16,875,000
|
|
 |
PF
|
23
|
6' 9"
|
205 lbs
|
Kentucky
|
$1,620,564
|
|
 |
SG
|
26
|
6' 5"
|
215 lbs
|
Villanova
|
$3,491,159
|
|
 |
C
|
20
|
6' 11"
|
220 lbs
|
Texas
|
$5,105,160
|
|
 |
C
|
26
|
6' 11"
|
250 lbs
|
--
|
$1,620,564
|
|
 |
SF
|
23
|
6' 8"
|
190 lbs
|
Duke
|
$27,285,000
|
|
 |
PG
|
19
|
6' 1"
|
170 lbs
|
Alabama
|
$3,640,200
|
|
 |
PF
|
22
|
6' 10"
|
234 lbs
|
Tulsa
|
--
|
|
 |
SF
|
23
|
6' 7"
|
220 lbs
|
Xavier
|
--
|
|
 |
PF
|
30
|
6' 9"
|
236 lbs
|
--
|
$4,102,564
|
|
 |
SG
|
36
|
6' 3"
|
200 lbs
|
Duke
|
$13,013,700
|
|
 |
SG
|
26
|
6' 4"
|
215 lbs
|
South Carolina
|
--
|
|
 |
PF
|
20
|
6' 7"
|
284 lbs
|
Duke
|
$10,245,480
|
Coach: Stan "Soon To Be Fired" Van Gundy
Update:
Injuries for Denver:
And for New Orleans:
Re-up: Yes I'm aware that trades/acquisitions may have been made and the above roster and or coach for the opposing team may be inaccurate. Hopefully you are aware that the fan-post format isn't equipped to make adjustments to the above template, so it often results in entire pieces being destroyed and or hours of work being lost. Simply put, it's not worth the additional effort/risk to change once the Nuggets have faced an opponent once. No disrespect intended. Tune in next season and I assure you the first time Denver plays your team, the roster will be up to date.
Re-re-up: Data only for the time being. Far too much, very-real life transpiring at the moment, mostly surrounding the health of loved ones and that is the bulk of my responsibility ATM. Apologies. Analysis should return in roughly a month, barring unforeseen circumstances. The data is sound.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Data:
TPM™ Game 62 NOP
Nikola Jokic: +44
Michael Porter Jr: +15
Aaron Gordon: +13
Monte Morris: N/A
PJ Dozier : +1
Facundo Campazzo: +28
Javalle McGee: +2
Paul Millsap: +2
JaMychal Green: N/A
Austin Rivers: +5
Zeke Nnaji: N/A
Vlatko Cancar: N/A
Bol Bol: N/A
Markus Howard: N/A
Shaquille Harrison: +2
Jamal Murray: N/A
Will Barton: N/A
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Total TPM™
Nikola Jokic: 62 games +2354
Michael Porter Jr: 52 games +622
Aaron Gordon: +17 games +196
Monte Morris: 44 games +378
PJ Dozier: 46 games +255
Facundo Campazzo: 56 games +386
Javalle McGee: +6 games +29
Paul Millsap: 48 games +240
JaMychal Green: 48 games +202
Austin Rivers: 5 games +18
Zeke Nnaji: 39 games -23
Vlatko Cancar: 33 games -7
Bol Bol: 27 games +34
Markus Howard: 31 games +10
Shaquille Harrison: 7 games +5
Jamal Murray: 47 games +968
Will Barton: 56 games +259
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Avg. TPM™ Per Game
Nikola Jokic: +37.97
Michael Porter Jr: +11.96
Aaron Gordon: +11.53
Monte Morris: +8.59
PJ Dozier: +5.54
Facundo Campazzo: +6.89
Javalle McGee: +4.83
Paul Millsap: +5.00
JaMychal Green: +4.21
Austin Rivers: +3.60
Zeke Nnaji: -0.59
Vlatko Cancar: -0.21
Bol Bol: +1.26
Markus Howard: +0.32
Shaquille Harrison: +0.71
Jamal Murray: +20.60
Will Barton: +4.63
__________________________________________________________________________________________
TPM™ Per-Minute Splits Through game 55:
*Credit DomP on the Spreadsheet. It's as if my (nerdy) baby (TPM™) learned to speak
Analysis:
Qtr1- The Nuggets go with their 17th starting five, consisting of Facu, Barton, Gordon, MPJ & Jokic. The Pel's counter with five dudes.
Denver is paced in TPM by __ as they __ after one.
Nikola Jokic: + Jamal Murray: + Will Barton: + Gary Harris: + Paul Millsap: + Monte Morris: + JaMichael Green: + Isaiah Hartenstein: + PJ Dozier: + Bol Bol:N/A Facundo Campazzo: + Zeke Nnaji: N/A RJ Hampton: N/A Vlatko Cancar: N/A Markus Howard: N/A
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Qtr2- The
Denver is paced in TPM by __ as they __ at the half.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Qtr3- The __
Denver is paced in TPM by __ as they __after three.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Qtr4- The
Denver is paced in TPM by __ as they __
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Final Thoughts:
- Denver wins 114-112
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The Nuggets Win!
We Suck Again!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
For context pertaining to the statistical aspects of this piece, please open this link: TPM™
A brief statement with regard to this piece on whole:
As a means to avoid repeating myself I will include this descriptive diatribe in all TPM posts going forward.
Sure I like statistics; ever since I was a child collecting sports cards and later a pre-teen who ran pre-internet fantasy sports leagues on ink/paper/spreadsheet for the four major US pro-leagues, I've been fascinated by box-score stats but I'm by no means an expert.
I created TPM (which has been around longer than RPM incidentally and unlike them, I fully disclose my non-proprietary system and I contextualize the action rather than being a boring, mysterious, predictive metric) because it does add immediate and accessible context to what we see and what the numbers indicate, which I like.
While the data is meticulously tracked and demonstrably sound, I'm a creative type, not an engineer. Algorithm is the bane of my existence in fact. I'd far rather approach life with the intrigue of expected surprise than attempt to get to the bottom of why things are the way they are. There are many engineers in my family so I totally understand that joy can be derived from finding solutions to problems, I just can't relate. It's not fun for me. THIS is for the most part, not fun for me.
Now I'm a 44 year old man who was born during the season in which the team I love joined the NBA. I happen to have a lifetime of experience with this sport in several different capacities, including playing (highly underrated within the writing community) so I understand basketball theory in a way most (by no means all) pundits do not.
I was in this case interested in a data-driven approach, which if I'm honest has sapped nearly all fun out of taking in games for me. I get very few days/nights off during the season. One piece requires several hours of research and data entry and all tracking/analysis is done in real time and published mere moments after each game's completion, 82 times per year.
As such, the analysis portion is about 90% (I've run the numbers) creative writing with sarcasm generally indicated through italics, non-sequitur humor and hyperbole, in an attempt to steal back some of the joy this endeavor has snatched away.
Hopefully there is a little something here for everyone but if you came just for data or are averse to colorful language, this is not the place for you. I have no way of knowing how many people even read this so I'll not be affected even remotely if you choose not to indulge. For those of you who do, I greatly thank you for the support.
